<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How the Postname Permalinks in WordPress 3.3 Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ottopress.com/2011/how-the-postname-permalinks-in-wordpress-3-3-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ottopress.com/2011/how-the-postname-permalinks-in-wordpress-3-3-work/</link>
	<description>You have to use an Ottopress to get fresh squeezed Otto.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:57:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6-beta3-24284</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Best Wordpress Permalink Settings For SEO &#124; Build Website TipsBuild Website Tips</title>
		<link>http://ottopress.com/2011/how-the-postname-permalinks-in-wordpress-3-3-work/comment-page-1/#comment-11553</link>
		<dc:creator>The Best Wordpress Permalink Settings For SEO &#124; Build Website TipsBuild Website Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ottopress.com/?p=731#comment-11553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] it is not a case anymore. Otto himself already update this problem about a year later in his post How the Postname Permalinks in WordPress 3.3 Work. But if you still cautious about this then you can follow the /%post_id%/%category%/%postname%/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it is not a case anymore. Otto himself already update this problem about a year later in his post How the Postname Permalinks in WordPress 3.3 Work. But if you still cautious about this then you can follow the /%post_id%/%category%/%postname%/ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaurav kaushik</title>
		<link>http://ottopress.com/2011/how-the-postname-permalinks-in-wordpress-3-3-work/comment-page-1/#comment-11518</link>
		<dc:creator>gaurav kaushik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 13:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ottopress.com/?p=731#comment-11518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hiii 
can anybody explain what should be the permalink of the custon post type because i think it make the wordpress complete cms and on the web custom post type becoming very popular but unfortunately about their permalink there is not any detailed information by the wordpress team and ...otto can you explain something about the performance for permalink of custom post type..if i have more than one post type and there is thousands of post in each post type ...what should be the best structure for performance?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hiii<br />
can anybody explain what should be the permalink of the custon post type because i think it make the wordpress complete cms and on the web custom post type becoming very popular but unfortunately about their permalink there is not any detailed information by the wordpress team and &#8230;otto can you explain something about the performance for permalink of custom post type..if i have more than one post type and there is thousands of post in each post type &#8230;what should be the best structure for performance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is the Best WordPress Permalink Settings for Your Website?</title>
		<link>http://ottopress.com/2011/how-the-postname-permalinks-in-wordpress-3-3-work/comment-page-1/#comment-11303</link>
		<dc:creator>What is the Best WordPress Permalink Settings for Your Website?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 20:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ottopress.com/?p=731#comment-11303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] One of the WordPress developers blogged about the performance improvement in WordPress 3.3. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One of the WordPress developers blogged about the performance improvement in WordPress 3.3. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://ottopress.com/2011/how-the-postname-permalinks-in-wordpress-3-3-work/comment-page-1/#comment-11227</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ottopress.com/?p=731#comment-11227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everywhere (also in the codex) the fix is referred to &quot;postname&quot;, so people like me might not understand, why ALL formerly slow structure tags are faster now (as you say in the last comment).

Sorry if it is just due to my lack of knowledge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everywhere (also in the codex) the fix is referred to &#8220;postname&#8221;, so people like me might not understand, why ALL formerly slow structure tags are faster now (as you say in the last comment).</p>
<p>Sorry if it is just due to my lack of knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otto</title>
		<link>http://ottopress.com/2011/how-the-postname-permalinks-in-wordpress-3-3-work/comment-page-1/#comment-11224</link>
		<dc:creator>Otto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ottopress.com/?p=731#comment-11224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Umm.. None of them. That&#039;s pretty much what this post explains. 

Using an ambiguous custom permalink structure for the single-post URLs will now only result in 1 extra query. No slowdowns of any kind.

In other words, this is now considered a fixed problem. This post details the technical behavior behind the &quot;fix&quot;.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm.. None of them. That&#8217;s pretty much what this post explains. </p>
<p>Using an ambiguous custom permalink structure for the single-post URLs will now only result in 1 extra query. No slowdowns of any kind.</p>
<p>In other words, this is now considered a fixed problem. This post details the technical behavior behind the &#8220;fix&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://ottopress.com/2011/how-the-postname-permalinks-in-wordpress-3-3-work/comment-page-1/#comment-11223</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ottopress.com/?p=731#comment-11223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the fast response. 
So whatever I change by editing, it still remains a &quot;postname-permalink&quot; in the eyes of WP, profiting from the performance improvements. O.k., fine. 

What permalink-structures STILL can cause slow speed with a lot of pages? All permalinks using textbased structure tags (i.e. category), except &quot;postname&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the fast response.<br />
So whatever I change by editing, it still remains a &#8220;postname-permalink&#8221; in the eyes of WP, profiting from the performance improvements. O.k., fine. </p>
<p>What permalink-structures STILL can cause slow speed with a lot of pages? All permalinks using textbased structure tags (i.e. category), except &#8220;postname&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otto</title>
		<link>http://ottopress.com/2011/how-the-postname-permalinks-in-wordpress-3-3-work/comment-page-1/#comment-11222</link>
		<dc:creator>Otto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ottopress.com/?p=731#comment-11222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t understand your question. This doesn&#039;t have anything to do with editing the permalink (post-slug). That wouldn&#039;t make any difference from any angle, and there never was any performance problem associated with it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand your question. This doesn&#8217;t have anything to do with editing the permalink (post-slug). That wouldn&#8217;t make any difference from any angle, and there never was any performance problem associated with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://ottopress.com/2011/how-the-postname-permalinks-in-wordpress-3-3-work/comment-page-1/#comment-11221</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ottopress.com/?p=731#comment-11221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Ptto,
thanks to your diligent report. Surely many WP-users are a bit happier now. One thing still confuses me, maybe you can clear it up. On the one hand you say &quot;The point of all of the above is that it no longer matters which setup you use, they’re ALL (!!!) pretty much the same now from a performance standpoint.&quot;
On the other hand you answer to Anatol &quot;And yes, the normal methods are unchanged.&quot; 

Let&#039;s assume, I choose the custom structure with &quot;postname&quot; and when creating a new page I EDIT the permalink, for example replacing the last two words by a keyword. What influence have those edits, does it still profit from your 3.3-improvement?

Thanks,

Martin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ptto,<br />
thanks to your diligent report. Surely many WP-users are a bit happier now. One thing still confuses me, maybe you can clear it up. On the one hand you say &#8220;The point of all of the above is that it no longer matters which setup you use, they’re ALL (!!!) pretty much the same now from a performance standpoint.&#8221;<br />
On the other hand you answer to Anatol &#8220;And yes, the normal methods are unchanged.&#8221; </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume, I choose the custom structure with &#8220;postname&#8221; and when creating a new page I EDIT the permalink, for example replacing the last two words by a keyword. What influence have those edits, does it still profit from your 3.3-improvement?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otto</title>
		<link>http://ottopress.com/2011/how-the-postname-permalinks-in-wordpress-3-3-work/comment-page-1/#comment-11218</link>
		<dc:creator>Otto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ottopress.com/?p=731#comment-11218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The patch is already in core and has been since WordPress 3.3.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The patch is already in core and has been since WordPress 3.3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://ottopress.com/2011/how-the-postname-permalinks-in-wordpress-3-3-work/comment-page-1/#comment-11109</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ottopress.com/?p=731#comment-11109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can anyone clarify; is this patch now included in a default WP install or do we have to download it and apply?

thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone clarify; is this patch now included in a default WP install or do we have to download it and apply?</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 425/445 objects using xcache

 Served from: ottodestruct.com @ 2013-05-19 04:55:00 by W3 Total Cache -->